Home > Management of Ambulatory Patients with Sleep Apnea: Application of Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guidelines Jean Wong

Management of Ambulatory Patients with Sleep Apnea: Application of Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guidelines Jean Wong

Page 1
1
Key words: Ambulatory and Office-Based Anesthesia | Patient Safety | Perioperative Medicine | Sleep
Medicine
Management of Ambulatory Patients with Sleep Apnea: Application of Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guidelines Jean Wong, MD, FRCPC Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto Department of Anesthesia, Women’s College Hospital Lusine Abrahamyan, MD Assistant Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto THETA Collaborative, Toronto General Research Institute Frances Chung, MBBS, FRCPC Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada Learning Objectives As a result of completing this activity, the participant should be able to: • State whether a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea increases the risk for postoperative complications in ambulatory surgical patients • Provide a comprehensive overview of the new Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guidelines and their relevance to the preoperative screening and assessment of ambulatory surgical patients with sleep-disordered breathing • Describe the best tools for screening obstructive sleep apnea in ambulatory patients

Page 2
2
• Discuss the best perioperative practices for ambulatory surgical patients with suspected or known obstructive sleep apnea • Summarize evidence on the effects of continuous positive airway pressure in ambulatory surgical patients Author Disclosures Dr. Wong has reported that she receives grants from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long- Term Care, Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation, and Acacia Pharma. Dr. Abrahamyan has reported no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests. Dr. Chung has reported that she receives research support from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, University Health Network Foundation, ResMed Foundation, Acacia Pharma, and Medtronics grants to institution, and royalties from Up-to-Date. STOP-Bang is proprietary to the University Health Network.

Page 3
3
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome is the most common type of sleep-disordered breathing and is characterized by recurrent apnea, hypopnea, or both lasting 10 seconds or longer during sleep despite ongoing efforts to breathe. Patients with OSA have increased depression of pharyngeal muscle tone during sleep, resulting in a recurrent pattern of partial or complete upper airway obstruction with impaired respiration.
1
The prevalence of mild OSA is 1 in 4 males and 1 in 10 females,
2,3
whereas moderate OSA occurs in 1 in 9 males and 1 in 20 females.
4,5
A significant number of OSA patients are undiagnosed when they come for elective surgery.
6
Approximately 10% to 20% of surgical patients, of whom 80% had not been previously diagnosed with OSA, were found to be at high risk for OSA based on preoperative screening.
7,8
An increase in the prevalence of OSA owing to the obesity epidemic as well as a greater number of operations performed as ambulatory procedures pose a practical challenge to the anesthesiologist. The suitability of ambulatory surgery in OSA patients remains controversial because of concerns for increased perioperative complications, including death, following discharge. The effects of residual anesthetics, sedatives, and opioids on upper airway muscle tone and ventilator responsiveness, along with postoperative supine positioning, may worsen OSA in the early postoperative period. At present, evidence related to the safety of ambulatory surgery for OSA patients is limited. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
9,10
and the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA)
11
have published guidelines that emphasize the importance of proper patient selection and management of OSA patients for ambulatory surgery. In 2016, the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine (SASM) published guidelines on preoperative screening and assessment of patients with OSA.
12
In this Refresher Course, we review the current postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with OSA and screening tools to detect

Page 4
4
it, and we describe application of the SASM guidelines and best perioperative practices for ambulatory surgical patients with suspected or known OSA. Summary of recommendations from the SASM Guidelines:
1
• OSA patients undergoing procedures under anesthesia are at increased risk for
perioperative complications compared with patients without the disease diagnosis. Identifying patients at high risk for OSA before surgery for targeted perioperative precautions and interventions may help to reduce perioperative patient complications.
• Screening tools help to risk stratify patients with suspected OSA with reasonable
accuracy. Practice groups should consider making OSA screening part of standard preanesthetic evaluation.
• There is insufficient evidence in the current literature to support canceling or delaying
surgery for a formal diagnosis (laboratory or home polysomnography) in patients with suspected OSA, unless there is evidence of an associated significant or uncontrolled systemic disease or additional problems with ventilation or gas exchange.
• The patient and the health care team should be aware that both diagnosed OSA (whether
treated, partially treated, or untreated) and suspected OSA may be associated with increased postoperative morbidity.
• If available, consideration should be given to obtaining the results of the sleep study and,
where applicable, the patient’s recommended positive airway pressure (PAP) setting before surgery.
• If resources allow, facilities should consider having PAP equipment for perioperative use
or have patients bring their own PAP equipment with them to the surgical facility.
• Additional evaluation to allow preoperative cardiopulmonary optimization should be
considered in patients with diagnosed, partially treated/untreated, and suspected OSA where there is indication of an associated significant or uncontrolled systemic disease or additional problems with ventilation or gas exchange such as: (i) hypoventilation
1 From: Chung F, Memtsoudis SG, Ramachandran SK, Nagappa M, Opperer M, et al.: Society
of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine guidelines on preoperative screening and assessment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesth Analg 2016; 123:452–73.

Page 5
5
syndromes, (ii) severe pulmonary hypertension, and (iii) resting hypoxemia in the absence of other cardiopulmonary disease.
• Where management of comorbid conditions has been optimized, patients with
diagnosed, partially treated/untreated OSA, or suspected OSA may proceed to surgery provided strategies for mitigation of postoperative complications are implemented.
• The risks and benefits of the decision to proceed with surgery or delay surgery should
include consultation and discussion with the surgeon and the patient.
• The use of PAP therapy in previously undiagnosed but suspected OSA patients should
be considered case by case. Because of the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials, we cannot recommend its routine use.
• Continued use of PAP therapy at previously prescribed settings is recommended during
periods of sleep while hospitalized, both preoperatively and postoperatively. Adjustments may need to be made to the settings to account for perioperative changes such as facial swelling, upper airway edema, fluid shifts, pharmacotherapy, and respiratory function. RISK FACTORS AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Patients are predisposed to OSA by various pathophysiological, demographic, and lifestyle factors.
13
These include anatomical abnormalities that may cause mechanical changes in the airway lumen (e.g., craniofacial deformities, retrognathia, macroglossia), connective tissue diseases (e.g., Marfan syndrome), endocrine diseases (e.g., hypothyroidism, Cushing disease), male gender, neck circumference greater than 40 cm, age above 50 years, and lifestyle factors including alcohol consumption and smoking. The prevalence of OSA may be up to 78% in morbidly obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery.
14
Obesity causes enlargement of soft tissue structures around the airway as well as narrowing of the pharyngeal airway. Lung volumes are markedly reduced by an increase in the abdominal fat mass. Reduction of lung volume may decrease longitudinal traction forces on the trachea and pharyngeal wall tension, which causes narrowing of the airway. Visceral obesity is common in subjects with OSA.

Page 6
6
OSA is associated with various comorbidities such as myocardial ischemia, heart failure, hypertension, arrhythmias, metabolic syndrome, cerebrovascular disease, insulin resistance, gastroesophageal reflux, and obesity. Sympathetic activation is increased by apneic episodes, which prevent the normal nocturnal decline in blood pressure. Sleep apnea associated with obesity leads to increased sympathetic tone, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic hypoxemia, and exaggerated swings in intrathoracic pressure during obstructive episodes. OSA also causes an increase in cavity size and wall thickness of the right ventricle. OSA is one of the common reasons for resistance hypertension.
15
Though OSA is not a component of metabolic syndrome (central obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance), experimental and clinical evidence demonstrates the relationship between OSA and cardiometabolic syndrome.
16
Anesthetic agents, including sedative-hypnotics, opioids, and muscle relaxants, exaggerate OSA-related airway instability and worsen the apnea. Surgical stress response during the postoperative period significantly changes sleep architecture.
17
These sequelae warrant a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of OSA and the effects of anesthetics on patients with the disorder. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) consists of the triad of obesity, daytime hypoventilation, and sleep-disordered breathing without an alternative neuromuscular, mechanical, or metabolic cause of hypoventilation.
18,19
OHS, which is often undiagnosed, has a prevalence of 10% to 20% in obese patients with OSA and 0.15% to 0.3% among the general adult population. Compared to eucapneic obese patients, OHS patients present with blunted central respiratory drive, severe upper airway obstruction, restrictive chest physiology, pulmonary hypertension, and increased mortality risk.
20
Compared with OSA patients, patients with OHS have a higher risk of perioperative complications including postoperative respiratory

Page 7
7
failure (odds ratio [OR] 10.9, 95% CI 3.7–32.3, P < 0.0001), postoperative heart failure (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9–15.7, P = 0.002), prolonged intubation (OR 3.1, 95% CI 0.6–15.3, P = 0.2), postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (OR 10.9, 95% CI 3.7–32.3, P <0.0001), and longer ICU and hospital stay.
21
Patients with OHS are generally not suitable candidates for operations at ambulatory surgical centers. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR OSA The gold standard for the diagnosis of OSA is the polysomnography or sleep study.
13
The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), defined as the average number of abnormal breathing events per hour of sleep, is used to diagnose and assess the severity of OSA. Diagnostic criteria for OSA by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) require either an AHI of 15 or above or AHI of 5 or higher with symptoms, such as daytime sleepiness, loud snoring, or observed obstruction during sleep.
22
OSA severity is considered mild for AHI of 5 to 15, moderate for AHI of 15 to 30, and severe for AHI above 30.
22
PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN OSA PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY A systematic review by the SASM task force on preoperative preparation of patients with sleep- disordered breathing identified 52 studies that reported on the association of OSA with selected perioperative outcomes for operations under general or neuraxial anesthesia.
23
In total, the included studies reported on 413,576 OSA patients (diagnosed by ICD-9 coding, polysomnography, chart or clinical diagnoses, and screening questionnaires) and 8,557,044 control (non-OSA) patients.
23
The majority of the studies reported worse outcomes among patients with OSA compared to the control group.
23
In another recent meta-analysis, OSA

Page 8
8
patients had 33.3% higher odds of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events up to 30 days after cardiac surgery and 18.1% higher odds of newly documented postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with non-OSA patients.
24
Regarding mortality, three studies reported a lower death rate in the OSA group and one study reported increased deaths among OSA patients. The lower mortality rate might result from better monitoring and management of diagnosed OSA patients, a protective effect of ischemic preconditioning, and the obesity paradox (obesity is protective and associated with increased survival) in OSA patients. The only study reporting a higher death rate was a population-based database study that found an association between a diagnosis of OSA and increased mortality in patients undergoing revision knee or hip arthroplasties.
25
OSA Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery Recent outcome studies on postoperative inpatients have clearly demonstrated serious cardiac and pulmonary complications in OSA patients, but evidence is limited regarding postoperative outcome in OSA patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. The systematic review conducted by SAMBA evaluated five prospective and two retrospective studies with various ambulatory surgical procedures including general surgery, orthopedic surgery, laparoscopic bariatric surgery, and upper airway surgery.
11
In that review, the postoperative outcomes of 1,491 patients with diagnosed or high-risk for OSA and 2,036 patients who were low-risk for OSA were compared with 2,095 non-OSA patients.
11
None of the included studies reported the need for a surgical airway, hypoxic brain injury, longer time to discharge, unanticipated hospital admission, death, or other clinically significant adverse outcomes. The systematic review also showed that OSA patients had a higher incidence of postoperative hypoxemia, but there was no

Page 9
9
increase in the need for ventilatory assistance or reintubation.
11
In a prospective cohort study, those patients with greater probability for OSA experienced more attempts at laryngoscopy, difficult laryngoscopic grade, and fiberoptic intubation.
8
Also, the use of intraoperative ephedrine, metoprolol, and labetalol was greater in OSA patients, but there was no difference in unanticipated hospital admissions.
8
A recent study on 404 ambulatory head and neck procedures in OSA patients showed no increase in either complications or readmissions.
26
A historical cohort study of 77,809 ambulatory surgical procedures did not identify any clinically significant increase in the rate of unplanned admissions related to a prior diagnosis of OSA in 674 OSA patients.
27
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety of conscious sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy did not find a difference in cardiopulmonary complications in patients with OSA.
28
However, a recent retrospective review of the legal literature on perioperative complications in OSA reported on 2 patients undergoing minor ambulatory procedures who received intraoperative opioids.
29
Both patients had hypoxic arrests and required emergent transfer to hospital with 1 patient dying and the other suffering anoxic brain injury. The lack of increased postoperative complications in some of these studies may be attributable to careful selection of OSA patients for ambulatory surgery, use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and minimal use of opioids. PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS Preoperative Assessment for OSA Routine preoperative screening for OSA in patients presenting for surgery may identify the majority of OSA patients and may provide opportunities for heightened awareness and potential risk reduction by implementing appropriate preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative

Page 10
10
interventions (Table 1).
12
Although the ultimate goal is to minimize the risk of postoperative complications as much as feasible by ensuring that every patient with suspected OSA is identified, clearly such an approach will result in a challenging logistical, economic, and clinical burden for healthcare providers.
12
Hence, a balance has to be struck between the desire to minimize postoperative complications and the responsible use of resources. The realistic goal is to stratify those at particular risk, and suggest methods to prevent or treat problems, without
creating undue economic burden on the healthcare system.
12
Screening tools such as STOP-Bang,
30-33
the perioperative sleep apnea prediction (P- SAP) score,
34
the Berlin questionnaire,
35
and the ASA Checklist
35
can be used as preoperative screening tools to identify patients with suspected OSA.
12
These tools have been validated in the surgical population. The characteristics of each tool are shown in Table 2.
12
The STOP-Bang questionnaire was initially developed for the surgical population but has been validated in various patient populations.
36
Patients with a STOP-Bang score of 0 to 2 are considered at low risk, 3 to 4 at intermediate risk, and 5 to 8 at high risk for OSA.
37-39
The STOP-Bang questionnaire has the highest methodological validity and accuracy in predicting a diagnosis of OSA.
40,41
A STOP-Bang score of 5 to 8 identifies patients with a high possibility of moderate to severe OSA.
37-39
The addition of a serum bicarbonate level 28 mmol/L or higher to a STOP- Bang score of 3 or above increases the specificity for a preoperative diagnosis of OSA.
42
For obese or morbidly obese patients, a STOP-Bang score of 4 or greater can be used as a cut-off to disqualify the patient for ambulatory surgery.
43
The STOP-Bang score can be used to risk stratify patients who are at high risk for OSA.
44
High-risk OSA patients (STOP-Bang score ≥3) had a longer hospital stay and almost 4-fold higher risk of postoperative complications compared with low-risk OSA patients.
44

Page 11
11
Also, the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) from a high-resolution oximeter is sensitive and specific to identify undiagnosed sleep-disordered breathing in surgical patients.
45
ODI is a good predictor of AHI. An ODI of 10 or higher has demonstrated a high sensitivity (93%) and reasonable specificity (75%) to detect moderate and severe OSA. Patients with preoperative mean overnight oxygen saturation below 93% or ODI higher than 29 events per hour were recently shown to be at higher risk for postoperative complications.
46
SASM guidelines indicate that additional evaluation for preoperative cardiopulmonary optimization should be considered in patients with a high probability of having OSA and in whom there is indication of uncontrolled systemic conditions or additional problems with ventilation or gas exchange. These conditions include, but may not be limited to: (1) hypoventilation syndromes, (2) severe pulmonary hypertension, and (3) resting hypoxemia not attributable to other cardiopulmonary disease.
12
Best Preoperative Practices in Patients Who Are Diagnosed with OSA, Are Nonadherent with Prescribed Therapy, or Have a High Pretest Probability for OSA Because OSA remains undiagnosed in the majority of patients presenting for surgery, many will be identified as having a high probability for OSA for the first time during the preoperative screening process or on the day of surgery.
12
In addition, many patients with an established diagnosis of OSA either refuse to use, or are poorly adherent with, their prescribed therapy. The optimal benefit of CPAP may require 4 to 6 weeks of treatment for upper airway edema to decrease.
47
There are limited data to suggest that preoperative PAP therapy in the form of CPAP, autotitrated positive airway pressure (APAP), or bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) may improve perioperative outcomes.
48-51
The limited benefit of CPAP in surgical patients was

Page 12
12
shown in a recent meta-analysis.
48
A diagnosis of OSA and the use of CPAP were associated with a reduction in postoperative complications, especially cardiac arrest and shock.
50
Another study found that OSA patients treated with CPAP have fewer cardiorespiratory complications than those without CPAP therapy.
51
All this evidence gives preliminary confirmation that patients with OSA may safely undergo ambulatory surgery if they are cautiously selected and receive focused perioperative care (Table 3). Patient Selection for Ambulatory Surgery In 2006 and 2014, the ASA published practice guidelines on the perioperative management of OSA patients
9,10
based on the severity of sleep apnea, invasiveness of the procedure, type of anesthesia, and the need for postoperative opioids. Using a systematic review of recent evidence, SAMBA published a consensus statement on the preoperative selection of patients with OSA for ambulatory surgery.
11
According to SAMBA guidelines, patients who have a diagnosis of OSA, are compliant with CPAP, have optimized comorbid conditions, and have minimal postoperative opioid requirements can be considered for ambulatory surgery (Figure 1).
11
However, patients who are noncompliant with CPAP may not be appropriate for ambulatory surgery. At the same time, patients with a presumed diagnosis of OSA, based on the screening tool, and optimized comorbid conditions may be considered for ambulatory surgery if postoperative pain relief can be managed predominantly with nonopioid analgesic techniques. In contrast to the ASA OSA guidelines, laparoscopic upper abdominal surgeries such as gastric banding may be safely performed on a day surgery basis provided the perioperative precautions are followed. Because of limited evidence, no guidance was provided for OSA patients undergoing upper airway surgery. A recent systematic review on selection of obese patients for

Page 13
13
ambulatory surgery showed that the literature lacks enough information to make recommendations regarding the selection of these patients and whether there is a cut-off of body mass index (BMI) for ambulatory surgery.
53
Super-obese patients with BMI greater than 50 kg/m
2
are at increased risk for perioperative complications, while patients with lower BMI do not present any elevated risk as long as comorbidities are optimized before surgery.
52
INTRAOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Monitored anesthesia care with local or regional anesthesia techniques should be considered where appropriate.
53
Intraoperative capnography should be utilized to monitor ventilation to avoid oversedation during monitored anesthesia care.
13
Difficult intubation equipment should be available in anticipation of difficulty intubating a patient with OSA. Preoperative sedatives should be avoided.
53
Recently, gabapentin was shown to be associated with increased risk for respiratory depression among patients undergoing major laparoscopic procedures. The dose of perioperative opioids should be reduced if gabapentin is administered.
54
Application of CPAP during bag and mask ventilation may be helpful to minimize upper airway obstruction during induction and immediately after extubation.
55
Short-acting agents such as propofol, desflurane, or sevoflurane and remifentanil should be utilized to ensure rapid recovery.
56
Nonopioid analgesic agents such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and local anesthesia infiltration should be administered to reduce postoperative opioid requirements. At the end of surgery, adequate reversal of neuromuscular blockade should be confirmed, and the patient should be extubated in the semiupright position when fully awake and recovered.
56

Page 14
14
POSTOPERATIVE DISPOSITION AND UNPLANNED ADMISSION AFTER AMBULATORY SURGERY The majority of cases of opioid-induced respiratory depression have been reported within 24 hours, mostly within the first 6 hours postoperatively.
57
Up to 50% of patients who died within 24 hours postoperatively from critical respiratory events had OSA.
58
In a closed claims analysis, OSA or suspected OSA was present in 24% of the patients with respiratory depression.
59
A significant association of postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression exists in patients with underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease.
58,60
Among patients with postoperative opioid- induced respiratory depression, 34% had preexisting cardiac disease and 25% had pulmonary disease.
60
Patients with diagnosed or suspected OSA who are receiving general anesthesia should have extended monitoring after they have met the modified Aldrete criteria for discharge.
10
Recurrent respiratory events (episodes of apnea ≥10 sec, bradypnea <8 breaths/min, pain– sedation mismatch, or repeated oxygen desaturation <90%) in the postanesthesia care unit are an indication for continuous postoperative monitoring.
61
OSA patients with recurrent respiratory events have an increased risk of postoperative respiratory complications.
61
These patients may require postoperative PAP therapy with monitoring.
12
Ambulatory surgical centers that handle OSA patients should have the ability to manage postoperative complications related to OSA and an agreement with an appropriate inpatient facility. Postoperative complications may result from an imbalance between enhanced pain processes and increased sensitivity to anesthetics, opioids, or both in patients with some specific OSA phenotypes.
62,63
In a recent systematic review of 60 deaths or near-deaths in surgical patients with OSA, 81% of the patients reported to be on opioid therapy were receiving

Page 15
15
relatively small doses of opioids with a morphine equivalent daily dose less than 10 mg; only 20% received a relatively higher dosage of opioids.
64
Further analysis of the dosage of intravenous opioids showed a clear dose–response pattern in the death or near-death group, i.e., increased odds of death or near-death with increasing opioid doses (OR of 1.0, 1.5, and 3.0 respectively at opioid doses of <10 mg, 10–25 mg, and >25 mg; P for trend <0.005).
64
Worsening of sleep-disordered breathing may occur in the first postoperative nights at home.
17,65
The use of opioids in unmonitored settings by patients with OSA increases the risk of complications. The anesthesiologist and surgeon should agree on postoperative analgesic medication, and patients should be advised to use acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and cyclo- oxygenase type 2 inhibitors rather than opioids. To reduce the risk of postoperative respiratory depression, the dose of opioids prescribed for discharge should be reduced if the patient was already taking gabapentinoids prior to surgery.
54
Patients should be educated to sleep in a semiupright position and to apply their PAP devices when sleeping, even during the daytime. It is necessary to educate surgeons, patients, and patients’ families regarding the need for increased vigilance after discharge home. Brief information in the form of pamphlets can be given to patients to educate them about OSA.
66
At present, there are practice variations in the way anesthesiologists manage patients with OSA.
67
Depending on the facilities and the types of surgery, it is essential that each ambulatory surgical facility establish an individualized policy and protocol for the management of surgical ambulatory patients with OSA.
68
More studies are needed to determine the optimal approach to the perioperative management of ambulatory surgical patients with OSA. CONCLUSION

Page 16
16
In recent years, there is a better understanding about the effect of anesthetics and opioids on postoperative sleep architecture in OSA patients. Careful selection of patients for ambulatory surgery using specific protocols and risk mitigation strategies are imperative to avoid cancellations and complications. Educating patients and the healthcare team will improve the perioperative outcome. With appropriate screening, careful patient selection, limited use of opioids, and algorithm-based management, the majority of ambulatory surgical procedures may be done safely in patients with OSA. References 1. Isono S: Obstructive sleep apnea of obese adults: pathophysiology and perioperative airway management. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:908–21. 2. Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM: Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177:1006–14. 3. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S: The occurrence of sleep- disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1230–5. 4. Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Ten Have T, Tyson K, Kales A: Effects of age on sleep apnea in men: I. Prevalence and severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:144–8. 5. Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Lin H-M, Ten Have T, Rein J, Vela-Bueno A, Kales A: Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in women: effects of gender. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:608–13.

Page 17
17
6. Singh M, Liao P, Kobah S, Wijeysundera DN, Shapiro C, Chung F: Proportion of surgical patients with undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea. Br J Anaesth 2013;
110:629–36.
7. Finkel KJ, Searleman AC, Tymkew H, Tanaka CY, Saager L, et al.: Prevalence of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea among adult surgical patients in an academic medical center. Sleep Med 2009; 10:753–8. 8. Stierer TL, Wright C, George A, Thompson RE, Wu CL, Collop N: Risk assessment of obstructive sleep apnea in a population of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. J
Clin Sleep Med 2010; 6:467–72.
9. Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, et al., for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management: Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Anesthesiology 2006; 104:1081–93.
10. Gross JB, Apfelbaum JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Coté CJ, et al., for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:268–86. 11. Joshi GP, Ankichetty SP, Gan TJ, Chung F: Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia consensus statement on preoperative selection of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea scheduled for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2012; 115:1060–8.

Page 18
18
12. Chung F, Memtsoudis SG, Ramachandran SK, Nagappa M, Opperer M, et al.: Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine guidelines on preoperative screening and assessment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesth Analg 2016; 123:452–73. 13. Raveendran R, Chung F: Ambulatory anesthesia for patients with sleep apnea. Ambul
Anesth 2015; 2:143–51.
14. Lopez PP, Stefan B, Schulman CI, Byers PM: Prevalence of sleep apnea in morbidly obese patients who presented for weight loss surgery evaluation: more evidence for routine screening for obstructive sleep apnea before weight loss surgery. Am Surg 2008;
74:834–8.
15. Khan A, Patel NK, O’Hearn DJ, Khan S: Resistant hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Int J Hypertens 2013; 193010. 16. Drager LF, Togeiro SM, Polotsky VY, Lorenzi-Filho G: Obstructive sleep apnea: a cardiometabolic risk in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;
62:569–76.
17. Chung F, Liao P, Yegneswaran B, Shapiro CM, Kang W: Postoperative changes in sleep-disordered breathing and sleep architecture in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:287–98. 18. Chau EHL, Lam D, Wong J, Mokhlesi B, Chung F: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: a review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and perioperative considerations.
Anesthesiology 2012; 117:188–205.

Page 19
19
19. Raveendran R, Wong J, Singh M, Wong DT, Chung F: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome, sleep apnea, overlap syndrome: perioperative management to prevent complications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30:146–55. 20. Castro-Añón O, Pérez de Llano LA, De la Fuente Sánchez S, Golpe R, Méndez Marote L, Castro-Castro J, Quintela AG: Obesity-hypoventilation syndrome: increased risk of death over sleep apnea syndrome. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(2):e0117808. 21. Kaw R, Bhateja P, Paz y Mar H, Hernandez AV, Ramaswamy A, Deshpande A, Aboussouan LS: Postoperative complications in patients with unrecognized obesity hypoventilation syndrome undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. Chest 2016; 149:84–
91.
22. Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson A, Quan SF: The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Westchester, Illinois, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2007. 23. Opperer M, Cozowicz C, Bugada D, Mokhlesi B, Kaw R, et al.: Does obstructive sleep apnea influence perioperative outcome? A qualitative systematic review for the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Task Force on preoperative preparation of patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:1321–34. 24. Nagappa M, Ho G, Patra J, Wong J, Singh M, et al.: Postoperative outcomes in
obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:2030–7.
25. D’Apuzzo MR, Browne JA: Obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for postoperative complications after revision joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(suppl):95–8.

Page 20
20
26. Baugh R, Burke B, Fink B, Garcia R, Kominksy A, Yaremchuk K: Safety of outpatient surgery for obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148:867–72. 27. Bryson GL, Gomez CP, Jee RM, Blackburn J, Taljaard M, Forster AJ: Unplanned admission after day surgery: a historical cohort study in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Can J Anesth 2012; 59:842–51. 28. Andrade CM, Patel B, Vellanki M, Kumar A, Vidyarthi G: Safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy with conscious sedation in obstructive sleep apnea. World J Gastrointest
Endosc 2017; 9:552–7.
29. Fouladpour N, Jesudoss R, Bolden N, Shaman Z, Auckley D: Perioperative complications in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing surgery: a review of the legal literature. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:145–51. 30. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA, Vairavanathan S, et al.: STOP questionnaire: a tool to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2008;
108:812–21.
31. Chung F, Yang Y, Brown R, Liao P: Alternative scoring models of STOP-Bang questionnaire improve specificity to detect undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin
Sleep Med 2014; 10:951–8.
32. Chung F, Abdullah HR, Liao P: STOP-Bang questionnaire: a practical approach to screen for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2016: 149:631–8. 33. Nagappa M, Wong J, Singh M, Wong DT, Chung F: An update on the various practical applications of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in anesthesia, surgery, and perioperative medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30:118–25.

Page 21
21
34. Ramachandran SK, Kheterpal S, Consens F, Shanks A, Doherty TM, Morris M, Tremper KK: Derivation and validation of a simple perioperative sleep apnea prediction score.
Anesth Analg 2010; 110:1007–15.
35. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA, Vairavanathan S, et al.: Validation of the Berlin questionnaire and American Society of Anesthesiologists checklist as screening tools for obstructive sleep apnea in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:822–30. 36. Nagappa M, Liao P, Wong J, Auckley D, Ramachandran SK, et al.: Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea among different populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015;
10(12):e0143697.
37. Chung F, Subramanyam R, Liao P, Sasaki E, Shapiro C, Sun Y: High STOP-Bang score indicates a high probability of obstructive sleep apnoea. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:768–75. 38. Farney RJ, Walker BS, Farney RM, Snow GL, Walker JM: The STOP-Bang equivalent model and prediction of severity of obstructive sleep apnea: relation to polysomnographic measurements of the apnea/hypopnea index. J Clin Sleep Med 2011;
7:459–65.
39. Chung F, Liao P, Farney R: Correlation between the STOP-Bang score and the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2015; 122:1436–7. 40. Ramachandran SK, Josephs LA: A meta-analysis of clinical screening tests for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:928–39. 41. Abrishami A, Khajehdehi A, Chung F: A systematic review of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea. Can J Anesth 2010; 57:423–38.

Page 22
22
42. Chung F, Chau E, Yang Y, Liao P, Hall R, Mokhlesi B: Serum bicarbonate level improves specificity of STOP-Bang screening for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2013;
143:1284–93.
43. Chung F, Yang Y, Liao P: Predictive performance of the STOP-Bang score for identifying obstructive sleep apnea in obese patients. Obes Surg 2013; 23:2050–7. 44. Nagappa M, Patra J, Wong J, Subramani Y, Singh M, et al.: Association of STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for sleep apnea and postoperative complications: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1301–8. 45. Chung F, Liao P, Elsaid H, Islam S, Shapiro CM, Sun Y: Oxygen desaturation index from nocturnal oximetry: a sensitive and specific tool to detect sleep-disordered breathing in surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:993–1000. 46. Chung F, Zhou L, Liao P: Parameters from preoperative overnight oximetry predict postoperative adverse events. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80:1084–95. 47. Ryan CF, Lowe AA, Li D, Fleetham JA: Magnetic-resonance-imaging of the upper
airway in obstructive sleep-apnea before and after chronic nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144:939–44.
48. Nagappa M, Mokhlesi B, Wong J, Wong DT, Kaw R, Chung F: The effects of continuous positive airway pressure on postoperative outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg
2015; 120:1013–23.

Page 23
23
49. Chung F, Nagappa M, Singh M, Mokhlesi B: CPAP in the perioperative setting: evidence of support. Chest 2016; 149:586–97. 50. Mutter TC, Chateau D, Moffatt M, Ramsey C, Roos LL, Kryger M: A matched cohort study of postoperative outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea: could preoperative diagnosis and treatment prevent complications? Anesthesiology 2014; 121:707–18. 51. Abdelsattar ZM, Hendren S, Wong SL, Campbell DA Jr, Ramachandran SK: The impact of untreated obstructive sleep apnea on cardiopulmonary complications in general and vascular surgery: a cohort study. Sleep 2015; 38:1205–10. 52. Joshi GP, Ahmad S, Riad W, Eckert S, Chung F: Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:1082–
91.
53. Seet E, Chung F: Management of sleep apnea in adults—functional algorithms for the perioperative period: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth 2010;
57:849–64.
54. Cavalcante AN, Sprung J, Schroeder DR, Weingarten TN: Multimodal analgesic therapy with gabapentin and its association with postoperative respiratory depression. Anesth
Analg 2017; 125:141–6.
55. Verbraecken J, Hedner J, Penzel T: Pre-operative screening for obstructive sleep apnoea.
Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26:160012.
56. Stierer TL, Collop NA: Perioperative assessment and management for sleep apnea in the ambulatory surgical patient. Chest 2015; 148:559–65.

Page 24
24
57. Gupta K, Prasad A, Nagappa M, Wong J, Abrahamyan L, Chung F: Risk factors for opioid-induced respiratory depression and failure to rescue: a review. Curr Opin
Anesthesiol 2018; 31:110–9.
58. Ramachandran SK, Pandit J, Devine S, Thompson A, Shanks A: Postoperative respiratory complications in patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea: a single institution cohort study. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:272–9. 59. Lee LA, Caplan RA, Stephens LS, Posner KL, Terman GW, Voepel-Lewis T, Domino KB: Postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression: a closed claims analysis.
Anesthesiology 2015; 122:659–65.
60. Weingarten TN, Herasevich V, McGlinch MC, Beatty NC, Christensen ED, et al.: Predictors of delayed postoperative respiratory depression assessed from naloxone administration. Anesth Analg 2015; 121:422–9. 61. Gali B, Whalen FX, Schroeder DR, Gay PC, Plevak DJ: Identification of patients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:869–77. 62. Doufas AG: Obstructive sleep apnea, pain, and opioid analgesia in the postoperative patient. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2014; 4:1–9. 63. Lam KK, Kunder S, Wong J, Doufas AG, Chung F: Obstructive sleep apnea, pain, and opioids: is the riddle solved? Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2016; 29:134–40. 64. Subramani Y, Nagappa M, Wong J, Patra J, Chung F: Death or near-death in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a compendium of case reports of critical adverse events.
Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:885-99.

Page 25
25
65. Chung F, Liao P, Elsaid H, Shapiro CM, Kang W: Factors associated with postoperative exacerbation of sleep-disordered breathing. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:299–311. 66. Ead H: Ambulatory surgery and obstructive sleep apnea—a challenge and opportunity for patient health teaching. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs 2016; 31:434–9. 67. Cordovani L, Chung F, Germain G, Turner, K, Turgeon AF, et al., for the Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group: Perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a survey of Canadian anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth
2016; 63:16–23.
68. Hillman DR, Chung F: Anaesthetic management of sleep-disordered breathing in adults.
Respirology 2017; 22:230–9.

Set Home | Add to Favorites

All Rights Reserved Powered by Free Document Search and Download

Copyright © 2011
This site does not host pdf,doc,ppt,xls,rtf,txt files all document are the property of their respective owners. complaint#nuokui.com
TOP