Home > Evaluation of Embedment Strength Data to Enable Reliability Analyses of Connections with dowel type fasteners Evaluation of Embe

Evaluation of Embedment Strength Data to Enable Reliability Analyses of Connections with dowel type fasteners Evaluation of Embe

Page 1
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Evaluation of Embedment Strength Data to Enable Reliability Analyses of Connections with dowel type fasteners
Evaluation of Embedment Strength Data to Enable Reliability Analyses of Connections with dowel type fasteners
Ad Leijten TU-Delft Jochen Köhler ETH-Zürich Results of a STSM
Ad Leijten TU-Delft Jochen Köhler ETH-Zürich Results of a STSM

Page 2
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
EC5 Deterministic model
EC5 Deterministic model
− Double shear fasteners
− Double shear fasteners
h,1,k 1 h,2,k 2 y,Rk h,1,k 1 v,Rk 2 h,1,k 1 y,Rk h,1,k
(g) 0,5 (h) 4 (2 ) min 1,05 2 (1 ) (j) 2 2 1,15 2 (k) 1 f t d f t d M f t d F f d t M f d
β β β β β β β β
      +  = + + −    +         + 

Page 3
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Determination Embedment strength according to EN383
Determination Embedment strength according to EN383

Page 4
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Stress displacement diagrams Parallel and Perpendicular
Stress displacement diagrams Parallel and Perpendicular

Page 5
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Embedment Definition
Embedment Definition

Page 6
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Data bases
Data bases
Source Parallel to grain Perp. To Total grain NAILS (not-drilled) tension compr. compr. Whale and Smith (1985a,b) 400 120 400 920 DOWELS Whale and Smith (1985a,b) 360 120 360 840 Ehlbeck and Werner (1992) 79 45 30 154 Sawata and Yasumura (2003) 503 506 1009 Mischler (not published) 80 50 130 Vreeswijk (2003) 62 62 Total Dowels 1249 946 2195 Total Nails + Dowels 1769 1346 3115

Page 7
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
mean st.d COV Sitka Spruce 357 393 39,1 10 Scots Pine 119 458 59 13 European Redwood 358 460 46,6 10 European Whitewood 119 390 41,6 11 Spruce Pine Fir 119 411 36,8 9 Picea jezoerisis (Jap) 1009 398 44,2 11 Spruce 151 446 51,7 12 Coniferous n density

Page 8
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
mean st.d COV Keruing 200 707 60,9 9 Greenhart 120 905 35,9 4 Beech 56 717 33,1 5 Teak 5 652 9,7 1 Oak 30 718 36,7 5 Merbau 19 802 36,5 5 Afzelia 20 714 24 3 Bongossi 35 1086 56,3 5 Massaranduba 10 972 27,3 3 Angelim Vermelho 11 1104 40 4 Azobe 10 1072 11,2 1 Cumaru 10 1142 18,7 2 n density Deciduous

Page 9
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Correlations Coniferous wood species
Sitka Spruce n=357 Diameter Emb Euro Whitew n=119 Diameter Emb Diameter 1 Diameter 1 Embedment 0,16 1 Embedment 0,57 1 Density -0,25 0,49 Density 0,36 0,61 Scots Pine n=119 Spr. Pine Fir n=119 Diameter 1 Diameter 1 Embedment 0,07 1 Embedment 0,32 1 Density 0,17 0,76 Density -0,09 0,41 Euro Redw. n=358 Jap. Pine n=1009 Diameter 1 Diameter 1 Embedment 0,23 1 Embedment -0,13 1 Density 0,03 0,5 Density 0,11 0,28

Page 10
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Oak n=30 Diameter Emb Beech n=56 Diameter Emb Diameter 1 Diameter 1 Embedment -0,24 1 Embedment -0,65 1 Density -0,01 0,57 Density 0,18 0,17 Bongossi n=35 Merbau n=19 Diameter 1 Diameter 1 Embedment -0,85 1 Embedment -0,79 1 Density 0,85 -0,7 Density 0,5 -0,13
Correlations Deciduous wood species

Page 11
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Data analyses Assumption: -Density and Diameter are Independent variables

Page 12
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Identified combinations for multi-linear regression analyses with
NAILS DOWELS Coniferous parallel parallel perpendicular perpendicular Deciduous parallel parallel perpendicular perpendicular

Page 13
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
for multi-linear regression analyses With: femb is the embedment strength A,B and C model parameters is the density d is the fastener diameter
B C h
f A d
ρ
=
ρ
ρ
* * * * h
f A B Cd
ρ ε
= + + +

Page 14
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Nails Nails n=397 n=319 n=120 n=80 Parallel Perpend Parallel Perpend Coniferous Coniferous Deciduous Deciduous
µa0
-4,562785 -3,085869 -5,533446 -7,904825
σa0
0,439676 0,390547 0,513015 0,533076
µa1
1,345241 1,148261 1,506924 1,886664
σa1
0,071756 0,064172 0,076790 0,079256
µa2
-0,272704 -0,419665 -0,181376 -0,418183
σa2
0,029885 0,026845 0,037282 0,038645
µsigeps
0,174512 0,140670 0,119008 0,100721
σsigeps
0,004379 0,003938 0,005432 0,005630
cov(a0;a1)
-0,995002 -0,994941 -0,993812 -0,993843
cov(a2;a1)
0,084639 0,039359 0,005608 0,004097
cov(a2;a0)
-0,181708 -0,137500 -0,114606 -0,112836
cov(a2;sigeps) 0,000030 -0,000033 0,000034 0,000258 cov(a0;sigeps) 0,000047 0,000580 0,000823 0,000177 cov(sigeps;a1) -0,000054 -0,000584 -0,000833 -0,000208
Regression parameters

Page 15
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Nails Parallel All Coniferous Species
10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 300 400 500 600 Density [kg/m3] Embedment [N/mm2] 2,65mm top 6mm bottom 2.65mm data 6mm data

Page 16
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Nails Parallel All Coniferous Species
10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 300 400 500 600 Density [kg/m3] Embe dme n t [N/mm2 ] 3,35mm top 5mm bottom 3.35mm data 5mm data

Page 17
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Nails Perpendicular All Coniferous Species
10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 300 400 500 600 Density [kg/m3] Embedment [N/mm2] 2,65mm top 6mm bottom 2.65mm data 6mm data

Page 18
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Nails Perpendicular All Deciduous
0,0 20,0 40,0 60,0 80,0 100,0 120,0 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Density [kg/m3] Embedment [N/mm2] 3,35mm top 6mm bottom 3.35mm data 6mm data

Page 19
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Dowels Parallel Japanese Pine
10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 density embedment 8mm top 12mm 16mm 20mm bottom 8mm data 12mm data 16mm data 20mm data

Page 20
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Dowels Perpendicular Japanese Pine
10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 density embedment 8mm top 12mm 16mm 20mm bottom 8 mm data 12 mm data 16 mm data 20 mm data

Page 21
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Regression results
Dowels Parallel Coniferous excl. Japanese data
10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 55,0 60,0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 density embedment 5mm top 8mm 12mm 16mm 20mm bottom 5mm data 7mm data 8mm data 12mm data 16mm data 20mm data

Page 22
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Principal of lower 5%-Fractile prediction
EC5

Page 23
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Nails
Nails d = 3.35 mm (n=140) Parallel All Coniferous Species
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Density [kg/m^3] embeding strength [MPa] 5%-Frac Mean regression 3.5mm data EC5

Page 24
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Nails
Nails Perpendicular (n=100) All Coniferous Species
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Density [kg/m^3] (5%-Frac) embeding strength [MPa] (5%- Frac) 5%-Frac Mean 3.35mm data EC5

Page 25
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Dowels
Dowels Parallel (n=140) Coniferous excl. Japanese Pine
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Density [kg/m^3] Embeding strength [MPa ] 5%-Frac Mean 12 mm 12 mm Data EC5

Page 26
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Dowels
Dowels (n = 116) Parallel Japanese Pine
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Density [kg/m^3] Em beding strength [M Pa] 5%-Frac Mean 20 mm Data 20 mm EC5

Page 27
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Dowels
Dowels Perpendicular (n=118) Japanese Pine
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Density [kg/m^3] embeding strength [MPa] 5%-Frac 20mm Mean 20 mm Data 20mm EC5

Page 28
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Dowels
Dowels Parallel (n=65) Deciduous Species
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Density [kg/m^3] e m be ding s tre ngth [MPa ] 5%-Frac 8 mm Mean 8 mm Data 8 mm EC5

Page 29
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Prediction of 5%-Fractile for Dowels
Dowels Parallel (n=91) Deciduous Species
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Density [kg/m^3] embeding strength [MPa ] 5%-Frac 16 mm Mean 16 mm Data 16 mm EC5

Page 30
Steel&Timber Structures
Steel&Timber Structures
Conclusions: - Reliability evaluation results in considerable lower 5% embedment strength compared to Eurocode 5. -Assumed cov of density (10%) and embedment strength (20%) does not affect 5% embedment as much as uncertainty in regression

Set Home | Add to Favorites

All Rights Reserved Powered by Free Document Search and Download

Copyright © 2011
This site does not host pdf,doc,ppt,xls,rtf,txt files all document are the property of their respective owners. complaint#nuokui.com
TOP